AFI Custom Search

To ensure you are reading the latest post, click the logo above.
SEARCH by topic, keyword or phrase. Type in Custom Search box
Use this Custom Search toole.g. "IBM Eclipse Foundation" or "racketeering"

Friday, January 19, 2018

URANIUM ONE JUDGE TIED TO MUELLER "WET-WARE" SURVEILLANCE PATENT & THEFT OF SOCIAL NETWORKING

Theodore D. Chuang must recuse or be dismissed

Contributing Writers | Opinion | AMERICANS FOR INNOVATION  | Jan. 18, 2018, Updated Jan. 19, 2018 | PDF | https://tinyurl.com/y8s8yazu
AFI. (Jan. 19, 2018). Uranium One Judge Tied to Mueller 'Wet-Ware' Surveillance Patent and Theft of Social Networking. Americans for Innovation.
Fig. 1–Judge Theodore D. Chuang. Has numerous relationships with lawyers associated with the Uranium One scandal. He must recuse himself or be dismissed from the first criminal indictment in Uranium One—U.S. v. Lambert, 18-cr-00012 (D. Md. Jan. 18, 2018).
Photo: American Justice Notebook.

(Jan. 18, 2017)—Judge Theodore D. Chuang was just assigned by chief judge James K. Bredar to the first Uranium One indictment U.S. v. Lambert, 18-cr-00012 (D. Md. Jan. 18, 2018). Mark T. Lambert, the former president of a Maryland-based transportation company was indicted on 11 counts related to foreign bribery, fraud and money laundering.

James K. Bredar
Fig. 2—Maryland Federal District Court chief judge James K. Bredar likely assigned Judge Chuang to the Uranium One case. However, Bredar himself had no business touching this case or even allowing it to come to his court. He was formerly employed at Perkins Coie LLP—the law firm swirling at the center of the Uranium One scandal. Bredar is evidently another James P. Chandler, III legal stooge, having graduated himself from Harvard, Yale and Georgetown. Chuang graduated from Harvard also.

Bredar disclosed DLA Piper LLP as one of his conflicts, and yet failed to mention that a predecessor to DLA Piper was Hill & Barlow LLP (Boston) where Robert Mueller was a partner along with a Chuang co-counsel with Ben T. Walker in defending Microsoft in a counterfeiting case managed by Chandler (who would eventually agree to be Leader Technologies' fated patent attorney). Bredar also worked a case with Rod Rosenstein where they imprisoned and deported at least nine individuals of Arab origin (US v. Doe, 564 F. Supp. 2d 480 (D. Md. 2008)) who had no legal counsel. Also notable, Bredar's confirmation hearing occured at the same time as the soon-to-be Leader v. Facebook replacement judge Leonard P. Stark. See Bredar Senate Confirmation Hearing (May 13, 2010) and Financial Report.

According to the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges Canon 2, federal judges must recuse themselves from presiding over cases where their involvement could be biased toward one party over the other. Canon 2 says that even the appearance impropriety dictates recusal.

In a federal district court office, the chief judge is the person who generally assigns judges to cases. On paper, the courts are required to maintain an ethics database to pre-screen for conflicts. These databases have been discovered to be incomplete or outright fraudulent.

Each judge is responsible to submit his or her conflicts to the database. So for example, if you represented Goldman Sachs before being appointed to the bench, Goldman Sachs must go on the list of companies for whom you cannot hear cases. However, if you hold a Vanguard Index Fund where Goldman Sachs is the largest single holding, you are ostensibly not required to disclose Goldman Sachs after Mar. 14, 2001 when the Judicial Conference approved what we call "The Great Mutual Fund Scam."

So, if a chief judge has been directed by his or her Deep State shadow government handlers to rule a certain way, he or she will choose a compliant judge to preside over that case.

Deep State criminals are pressing for plea bargains & Res Judicata

Judges have an often-abused privilege called "judicial discretion." This gives them great latitude over the conduct of a case, including summary judgments and motions to dismiss. Generally, given enough time, a group of unscupulous lawyers can concoct a way to convict a ham sandwich.

Once a judge absolves a criminal defendant of a crime in a motion to dismiss or summary judgment (pre-trial rulings), it is very difficult to overcome such a ruling under "Res Judicata." All you can do is appeal. However, if a corrupt judge is assigned to the appeal, the chances of seeing justice are nil. The U.S. Supreme Court takes very few appeals once you have lost your Circuit Court appeal.

Res Judicata means a person cannot be sued twice for the same matter. Therefore, the best way for the Deep State shadow government to be absolved of its crimes is to be tried in front of one of its many crony judges who will rule in their favor, and thus prevent a second trial on those counts.

In this Uranium One case, Judge Chuang was assigned by fellow Harvard Law grad chief judge James L. Breder. Judge Breder was appointed by Barack Obama on April 21, 2010.

Judge Theodore D. Chuang cannot possibly claim to be impartial in Uranium One

Theodore D. Chuang
Fig. 3—Theodore D. Chuang has no business touching the Uranium One case given his conflicts as well as those of his chief judge James K. Bredar.

A joint Americans for Innovation and American Intelligence Media investigation has uncovered a nest of ties among parties implicated in Uranium One. These ties engulf Judge Chuang in a twisted knot of interrelationships that make it impossible for him to be impartial.

Social networking invention theft

In addition, Judge Chuang is tied to central actors in the theft of the social networking invention, most especially Harvard Law professor James P. Chandler, III. Chandler agreed to be Leader Technologies, Inc.’s patent attorney in 2000, then stole Leader's invention and shuffled it to the IBM Eclipse Foundation. Eclipse then distributed it to the federal government and military-industrial complex in Silicon Valley.

Monstrous cyborg “Internet of Things” total surveillance patent

Chuang was actually working at Robert Mueller’s former law firm Wilmer Hale LLP (formerly Hale & Dorr LLP) when Hewlett-Packard engineer Richard C. Walker (aka Rick Walker) filed for patents on global surveillance. Walker filed these patents in the name of a sham company named “Kline & Walker LLC” that he has hidden from the public in all of his biographies. See Meet The Person Who Can Remotely Crash Planes and Can Read Your Mind.

Bookmark: #patent-to-crash-planes | https://tinyurl.com/ya7lja5v
https://youtu.be/PIIbqNQj8Is
https://youtu.be/Ei3v6ubvSJw

This patent is just unbelievable. It even describes embedded cyborg chips in people, which it calls “wet-ware.” These chips can control muscles, emit mind-altering frequencies, and put people to sleep or otherwise disable them or their vehicles, including aircraft. Mobile phones are also similarly wired, including emiting light and sound triggers.

Chuang’s Microsoft holdings demand his recusal

Robert Mueller and Bill Clinton have both been paid by Microsoft for speeches. Chuang and Ben T. Clements, Mueller’s law partner in Hill & Barlow LLP (Boston), actually represented Microsoft and the Justice Department in a criminal case advised by James P. Chandler, III.

On Apr. 27, 2009, Mueller actually delivered uranium samples to the Russians on instructions from the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Chuang’s Microsoft holding dictate his recusal given Microsoft’s intimate relationships with Mueller, the Clintons, James P. Chandler, III and Chuang’s co-counsel Ben T. Clements, Mueller’s partner in Hill & Barlow LLP.

What follows is the American Intelligence Media / Americans for Innovation investigation on Theodore D. Chuang.


American Intelligence Media

Another Dirty Judge Cleaning Up Clinton Crimes

A citizens intelligence report by American Intelligence Media and Americans for Innovation PDF |https://tinyurl.com/y9z699os

Theodore D. Chuang
Fig. 1: Maryland Federal District Court Judge Theodore D. Chuang assigned to the first Uranium One criminal action. U.S. v. Lambert, 18-cr-00012 (D. Md. Jan. 18, 2018). Photo: CJNotebook.

Jan. 17, 2018—Judge Theodore D. Chuang is a federal judge that seems to be more interested in thwarting the intent of the president than dealing with the rampant abuse of power and destruction of the rule of law by his corrupt chums in Washington.

If his name is somewhat familiar to you, this is the federal judge in Hawaii who attempted to block Trump’s travel ban in summer 2017. In his ruling, Chuang wrote that President Trump’s own tweets helped convince him that the latest policy is an “inextricable re-animation of the twice-enjoined Muslim ban” that Trump called for on during the campaign trail and would likely be found unconstitutional.

Although Chuang is in Hawaii, his office is part of Maryland District Court system. His ruling on the travel ban case was taken to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia where it was upheld. The Trump administration then went to the Supreme Court for a ruling where Chuang’s ruling, as well as other similar cases, were rejected.

Theodore Chuang is back in the news. This time he has been appointed as the judge over the first Uranium One criminal action.  U.S. v. Lambert, 18-cr-00012 (D. Md. Jan. 18, 2018).

Former President of Maryland-Based Transportation Company Indicted on 11 Counts Related to Foreign Bribery, Fraud and Money Laundering Scheme

We call for Chuang’s immediate recusal or dismissal of this case. Not only has he shown his extreme political bias in the Trump travel ban ruling, but he has no business being involved with the Uranium One case. He cannot possible comply with the Code of Conduct Canon 2 which dictates that he avoid even the appearance of impropriety.

Theodore D. Chuang’s Hopeless Conflicts of Interest

Let’s deep dive into Chuang’s biography and connect the dots of his questionable history as it relates to being able to rule on the Uranium One case in an impartial way.

On May 2, 2014, Theodore D. Chuang was appointed by President Barack Obama as a judge in the US District Court of Maryland.

On Jan. 10, 2018, Chuang was assigned as presiding judge presiding over the first Uranium One indictment.

Chuang attended Harvard Law School and edited the Harvard Law Review contemporaneously with Barack Obama. Given Harvard’s notoriously-known meddling in Russia and the biography that we now know of former economics professor Larry H. Summers, these associations with Obama administration principles taint his objectivity in ruling on a case that will involve so many Deep State players.

As we connected the dots with Chuang and the people, mentors, teachers, and contacts in his biography, the picture emerged looking like this:

Theodore D. Chuang Relationships Map
Fig. 2: Theodore D. Chuang  Conflicts of Interest Relationships Map compiled Jan. 18, 2018 among Theodore D. Chuang; Robert S. Mueller, III; James P. Chandler, III; Bill & Hillary Clinton, Microsoft, Uranium One, Patrick L. Deval, Mitt Romney, Bain Capital, Ben T. Clements, Hill & Barlow LLP (Boston), Economic Espionage Act of 1996. Compiled from public sources by Americans for Innovation, American Intelligence Media.

Many of the mutual funds in which Judge Chuang is invested hold substantial amounts of financial interests in Microsoft and Goldman Sachs. Goldman Sachs was a Uranium One deal underwriter. See Fig. 3 below. 

On Mar. 14, 2001, James P. Chandler, III and his judicial cronies manipulated the reporting rules at a meeting of the Judicial Conference regarding mutual funds so that judges could hide financial holdings in deep-pocket companies who come before their court. See How Judges & Bankers Grow Rich on the Backs of American Inventors (The Great Mutual Fund Scam)

Uranium One Meme

Chuang cannot possibly avoid Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges Canon 2 in the Uranium One case due to his obvious conflicts of interest.

From Mueller to the Clintons, Holder to Lynch, they are all wrapped up in the U1 crime, and Chuang, who has been mentored and supported by these swamp players throughout his career, will most likely become their judicial protector.

The Uranium One case includes the suspected involvement of Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, the U. S. State Department, Robert S. Mueller, III, James B. Comey, Rod J. Rosenstein, James P. Chandler, III, Loretta Lynch and Eric H. Holder, Jr.

Chuang’s Questionable Background Should Be An Immediate Dismissal From This High Profile Case

Chuang’s confirmation statement highlighted this case: US v. Simons et al, 97-CR-10334-GAO (D. Ma. Dec. 16, 1997).

Chuang collaborated with Microsoft to get an almost $1 million conviction of defendants accused of counterfeiting Microsoft Office software. This was one of the first cases managed by law professor James P. Chandler, III who had coached the White House and Congress on passage of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996, Federal Trade Secrets Act and False Statements Accountability Act (legalizing lying to Congress and Courts) on Oct. 11, 1996.

Chandler was tasked with advising all U.S. Attorneys, including Theodore C. Chuang, before bringing forward intellectual property criminal cases.

SENATE TESTIMONY: p. 42

Uranium One Meme

DOCKET: p. 2

Uranium One Meme

Chuang holds stock in Microsoft and Cisco. SENATE TESTIMONY: p. 6:

Uranium One Meme
Fig. 3Theodore D. Chuang 2013 Financial Disclosure. Confirmation Statement as Judge for the U.S. District of Maryland, Dec. 19, 2013. U,S, Senate.

Chuang’s US Attorney co-counsel in US v. Simons was Ben T. Clements.

SENATE TESTIMONY: p. 43

DOCKET: p. 23

Uranium One Meme

This case shows that Chuang was taking instructions from Deep State shadow government lawyer James P. Chandler, III who was also advising Robert Mueller, Bill and Hillary Clinton, James B. Comey, Rod J. Rosenstein, James A. Baker. These individuals were deeply embedded in the FBI, NSA, CIA counterespionage operations.

Between 1990 and 1994, Ben T. Clements was a partner at Hill & Barlow LLP, Boston, according to his public biographies.

Uranium One Meme

Between 2005-2010, Ben T. Clements was chief legal advisor to Gov. Patrick L. Duval.

Note that Duval is deeply connected to the D.C. criminal cabal as we outlined in our article entitled: Mueller’s Pathetic Attempt to Overthrow Trump and Prepare His 2020 Successor Fails Miserably

Uranium One Meme

Between 1986-1994, Patrick L. Duval was a partner at Hill & Barlow LLP, according to his public biographies.

Between 1988-1989, Robert S. Mueller, III was a partner at Hill & Barlow LLP, according to his Senate testimony.

Hill & Barlow LLP was a boutique law firm. Therefore, the insider relationships among Clements, Duval, Chandler & Mueller are unmistakable.

Chuang’s collaboration with Clements re. an intellectual property case advised by Chandler, in turn associates him with Clements, Duval & Mueller.

Between 2004-2007, Chuang was counsel at Wilmer Hale LLP in Washington, D.C. Robert S. Mueller, III was a partner at Wilmer & Hale LLP

SENATE TESTIMONY, p. 15.

Uranium One Meme

See SENATE TESTIMONY: p. 32

Uranium One Meme

Between 1993-1995, Robert S. Mueller, III was a “Senior Partner” at Wilmer Hale & Dorr LLP.

What are the odds that Mueller and Chuang would both be partners at the same law firm twice (Hill & Barlow LLP, Wilmer Hale LLP) during their careers, before working at the U.S. Justice Department? Chuang’s impropriety is palpable.

Uranium One Meme

On Apr. 27, 2009, newly appointed (Jan. 21, 2009) Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ordered FBI Director Robert Mueller to deliver uranium samples to the Russians, thus implicating him directly in the Uranium One scandal.

Uranium One Meme
Fig. 4: Hillary Clinton. (Apr. 20, 2009). Secretary of State Cable to Tiblisi, Georgia, Moscow, Russia, SECRET STATE 038943, ALERTING GOR OF DELIVERY OF SEIZED HEU DURING APRIL 27 [2009] FBI DIRECTOR’S [Robert S. Mueller, III] TRIP TO MOSCOW, U.S. State Department. WikiLeaks.

Given Chuang’s intimate associations with Hill & Barlow LLP partners Mueller, Deval and Clements, and each of their intimate associations with James P. Chandler, III, shows these men to be a tight cabal within the Justice Department, State Department, FBI and with the Clintons.

How Did Chuang Become a Multi-Millionaire As a Government Employee?

As with all biographical timelines that we review, we pay particular attention to the individual’s net worth in relationship to the jobs they have held. In Chuang’s case, we found that he had amassed total assets of $3.6 million by 2013.

His financial statement is in his Senate Hearing Confirmation Documents:

S. Hrg. 113-515, Pt. 6. (Dec. 19, 2013). Confirmation Hearing for Theodore D. Chuang. Senate Judiciary Committee. 113th Congress, First Session. Ser. No. J-113-1. U.S. Senate.

Specifically, see Theodore D. Chuang NET WORTH, p. 72

Uranium One Meme

Chuang is as Radioactive as Uranium One Treason

Chuang is clearly a Chandler/Mueller cartel pawn. He was mentored by Chandler, who was coaching the DOJ Criminal Division on prosecution of the new Economic Espionage Act of 1996 et al. He worked at the DOJ in the Criminal Division with Comey, Rosenstein, etc. Chuang worked at Mueller’s Wilmer & Hale LLP twice.

He clerked at the corrupt 9th Circuit in San Francisco.

Notably, he was at Wilmer Hale when they were handling the Richard C. Walker patents. Then he became counsel at DHS where Walker’s patent and Kappos/Chandler’s Eclipse Foundation and NIAC were being implemented to build the surveillance state.

If you have never heard the name Richard C. Walker, then read our expose on the man that holds monstrous patents that threatens human civilization: How They Plan to Control Everything in Your Life

We Demand His Recusal

In the Senate Hearing document listed above, Chuang specifically told the Senate Judicial Committee at his confirmation hearing that he will recuse himself from matters related to Homeland Security.

CONFIRMATION STATEMENT, P. 661: “I would recuse in any litigation in which I had played a role. In particular, a case involving the United States Department of Homeland Security.as a party might present a conflict of interest.”

He worked at Homeland Security from 2009-2011, hence the statement of recusing himself from litigation regarding DHS.

Yet, here he is presiding over the most explosive homeland security in our nation’s history. Is not the illegal handling of uranium a Homeland Security related matter?

On top of that, if you overlay the biographies of Mueller, Rosenstein, Clinton, and Chuang during this 2009-2011 time frame, one can’t but wonder if Chuang wasn’t complicit in the very crime itself. After all, he was General and Associate General Counsel of Homeland Security during the time that the Uranium One deals were being played out.

Uranium One Meme
Fig. 5: Theodore D. Chuang. (Feb. 15, 2005). Biography. Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale and Dorr LLP. (Spreadsheet *.xls of Theodore D. Chuang biography.)

Here is Chuang, under ethics oath, making his commitment to avoid Potential Conflicts of Interest, SENATE TESTIMONY p. 60

THEODORE D. CHUANG, Dec. 19, 2013), p. 661: “I would recuse in any litigation in which I had played a role. In particular, a case involving the United States Department of Homeland Security.as a party might present a conflict of interest.”
Uranium One Meme
Fig. 6: Theodore D. Chuang’s Statement to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee on Potential Conflicts of Interest. S. Hrg. 113-515, Pt. 6. (Dec. 19, 2013). Confirmation Hearing for Theodore D. Chuang. Senate Judiciary Committee. 113th Congress, First Session. Ser. No. J-113-1. U.S. Senate, p. 661.

Chuang is as corrupt as the masters he serves.

Chuang cannot possibly comply with the Code of Conduct, Canon 2 which dictates that he avoid even the appearance of impropriety.

Chuang’s work with Mueller, Chandler, Wilmer Hale LLP and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security totally disqualifies him.

Chuang must be removed from the Uranium One case

Bookmark: #dick-morris-on-chuang

Update! Jan. 20, 2018
Dick Morris on Judge Chuang plea bargain scheme to protect political friends

https://youtu.be/AaVOgB5qgHc

* * *

Notices: This post may contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Photos used are for educational purposes only and were obtained from public sources. No claims whatsoever are made to any photo.

Comment

Click "N comments:" on the line just below this instruction to comment on this post. Alternatively, send an email with your comment to amer4innov@gmail.com and we'll post it for you. We welcome and encourage anonymous comments, especially from whisteblowers.

Thursday, January 11, 2018

MEET THE PERSON WHO CAN REMOTELY CRASH PLANES AND CAN READ YOUR MIND

Monstrous Patent calls people “wet ware”

Implanted devices deliver electric shock, poisons, dopamine, adrenaline, emit mind control frequencies

Hewlett-Packard & Agilent Technologies are complicit

Contributing Writers | Opinion | AMERICANS FOR INNOVATION  | Jan. 11, 2018, Updated Jan. 176, 2018 | PDF | https://tinyurl.com/y7rj2xfy
AFI. (Jan. 11, 2018). Meet The Geek Who Can Remotely Crash Planes And Read Your Mind. Americans for Innovation.
QRS-11 gyrochip
Approx. width of a quarter
Fig. 1–Richard C. Walker, Agilent Technologies (Palo Alto, CA) holds monstrous "Internet of Things" Patents that can take down planes with remote instructions to one little QRS-11 sensor in the autopilot system. The global surveillance grid includes embedded chips in planes, devices, equipment and people to remotely send signals and control every element of The Internet of Things network. The QRS-11 quartz rate sensor (the diameter of a quarter; also see AbelDanger.org for more detail on the uninterruptable autopilot) is embedded in most aircraft autopilots. The intelligence version of the sensor can be turned off remotely and bring down the plane. In the late 1980's and early 1990's,
Hillary Clinton's Rose Law Firm in Little Rock, Arkansas handled the QRS-11 patent family. Her mentor, managing partner J. Joseph Giroiri, was on the board of the assignee of the patents - BEI Technologies, Inc.
Hillary Clinton's Rose Law Firm in Little Rock, Arkansas was the original attorney representing the inventor of the QRS-11 sensor in BEI Electronics/Technologies (US Pat. Nos. 3,974,428; 3,976,997; 4,628,298). This sensor was so critical to national security that the State Department fined Boeing $16 million for illegal exports. After many mergers and company sales, the rights to the QRS-11 went to France for a decade owned by Schneider Electric SA. Schneider sold the rights to a Barclays Bank client in London. The Rose Law Partner who hired Hillary, J. Joseph Giroiri,
Walker's system can crash planes remotely
served on the BEI Technologies board of directors. He also coordinated the Clinton's China and Indonesia banking connections associated with their Mena, Arkansas drug smuggling, money laundering and sex trafficking.

Barclays then sold the company and the QRS-11 patent rights to Sensata, Inc. which is controlled by Mitt Romney's Goldman Sachs-aligned Bain Capital in Boston. Tellingly, dozens of former Clinton staff have died in mysterious airplane and vehicle crashes. Also telling, the late FBI Superstar Ted Gunderson, said in 2005 that Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVay had a bio chip surgically installed in him by Dr. Louis Jolyon "Jolly" West who led the rogue C.I.A.'s MKUltra mind control program. Conveniently for Bill and Hillary, the Oklahoma City bombing destroyed the records of the FBI investigation on Janet Reno's WACO criminality. The bombing also killed former Clinton chief of security Alan G. Whicher. Four other Clinton's bodyguards (C. LeBleu/T., T. McKeaham,, R. Williams,, S. Willis) were shot in the head by a helicopter sniper at the illegal military siege of the Branch Davidian property in Waco, Texas (1993). Some call these deaths "Arkancide" since most everyone associated with the Clintons in Arkansas, except Larry Nichols, have died. Nichols produced The Clinton Chronicles (1994) to expose the Clinton devilish corruption. Despite ill health, Larry carries on the struggle to bring the Clintons to justice.
Photo: ResearchGate.
Bookmark: #ieee-patent-fraud | https://tinyurl.com/yc54h8pw
Update! Jan. 16, 2018
Ethernet Engineers—Whistleblow!
IEEE 803.2 Ethernet standard
Most computer engineers have no idea how the IEEE 802.3 data transmission Ethernet standard was developed (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers). We have just discovered that it was shoved down our throats by Deep State shadow government forces intent on controlling the Internet as a global spy grid and corporatist profit machine. Richard C. Walker a.k.a Rick Walker was a stooge for Agilent Technologies who was evidently tapped by the Highlands Group to seize control of technology standards needed for the takeover. This post contains hard, indictable evidence that proves the identities of the corporatists involved with HP/Agilent, including 3Com, Qualcomm, Broadcom, Cisco, IBM, Sun, Intel, NTT (Japan Telephone), Cielo, Quake, nSerial, Nortel, World Wide Packets. See Jul. 10, 2000 IEEE meeting slides where Walker’s pushes standards proposed on Mar. 06, 2000—the same day he filed for a patent (became U.S. Pat. No. 6,718,491) on the same slides. Mindspring engineer Roy Bynum complained that Walker was railroading the standard. Of course, after filing his patent, Walker had a vested interest in having it become the IEEE standard for data transmission. It did, to this day.

Patents last for 20 years from the time they are filed. Walker assigned it to HP/Agilent Technologies. Then inexplicably, on Jun. 24, 2013, the Patent Office allowed an almost identical patent U.S. Pat. No. 9,451,057 on the 802.3 Ethernet standard by a subsidiary of Marvell International, Ltd. thru inventor Brett A. McClellan, a Bahamian corporation with offices in Colorado.The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) overrode the Examiner Eric A. Myers (Art Unit 2474) who had ruled that Marvell's filing was doubly unpatenable as being essentially a copy of Walker's earlier dubious Ethernet patents. Walker filed eleven (11) patents assigned to Hewlett-Packard and fourteen (14) assigned to Agilent Technologies, Inc. The PTAB overruled Examiner Myers and awarded it to McClellan/Marvell anyway, void of substantive reasons, the PTAB (secret three-judge internal patent court) magically accepted ALL of Marvell's previously rejected novelty arguments. Therefore, Marvell's value appears to be fraudulent, yet they claim control of the 802.3 Ethernet standard driving all Internet data transmission. This evident corruption in the U.S. Patent Office shows it has become nothing but a rubber stamp for corporatists, and not a protector of American inventors.


Listen to this Bombshell video while you read the rest of this post | Spread the word

https://youtu.be/PIIbqNQj8Is

ORIGINAL POST

(Jan. 11, 2017)—What AFI and American Intelligence Media (AIM) researchers have just discovered is breathtaking, disgusting, astounding and monstrous. It is also shocking how far along the plan is. Amazingly, the Deep State shadow government, in its evident hubris, has fully disclosed their diabolical technology scheme for “The Internet of Things” in writing.

The patent actually says that their plan is to identify, tag, track and control literally everything on the planet. Their unquestioned plan is to embed micro-electronic control devices, either surgically or by injection, in every human being on the planet. To them, it’s all about “management of the world’s resources” including you. Walker Patent No. 6,965,816 Col. 118, Lns. 53-54.

Why would they publish these plans? They evidently believed that these documents would not surface until after they had seized control.

Unbelievably, you are just “wet-ware”

These documents show that their authors have a total disdain for humanity. These define people as "wet-ware." In this world view, a human is merely a silicon chip surrounded by a membrane of carbon and water.

Bookmark: #wet-ware | https://tinyurl.com/yc3rnfbc

These are the people who are planning to take over the world.

Read for yourself:
Here are two lines captured from the actual patent: U.S. Patent No. 6,965,816, Col. 3, Lns. 5-6 ('This requires hardware, software and wet-ware (people) - the procedures and protocols')

"PFN" means Protected Primary Focal Node. "TRAC" means Trusted Remote Activity Controller.

The illustrations in Walker's patent are truly dystopian (a community or society that is undesirable and/or frightening)—and they have been implemented! Their message is clear: "you can run but you cannot hide." In this illustration, even the trees are watching you! Here is Figure 21 from Walker's patent.

Bookmark: #blanket-surveillance | https://tinyurl.com/yabtllwb

Click image to enlargeU.S. Patent No. 6,965,816, Fig. 21.

Patents are intentionally arcane and hard to understand

For example, “inequitable conduct” means fraud, “prosecute” means make filings, “on-sale bar” means sell an invention too soon, “Markman” handles technical definitions, “pro hac vice” means an out-of-state attorney, “pro se” means means represent yourself, and so on.

Patent lingo insulates the “old boy” club of patent lawyers and judges from We The People accountability.

Bookmark: #patent-tutorial | https://tinyurl.com/ycsmq78w

Categories of intellectual property

Patents are a form of intellectual property alongside trade secrets, copyrights, trademarks and trade dress. Here’s a thumbnail tutorial.

Trade secrets are anything you do or think that is not publicly known that you have taken reasonable means to protect, like the way you solve a problem or build something.

Copyrights are your thoughts reduced to some medium like pen, paper, program or design, like books, artwork, type or manuscripts.

Trademarks are unique names, phrases and other expressions used in commerce and assigned to you in order to avoid confusion in your marketplace. For example, it would be confusing to have two companies in your state with the same names.

Trade dress is the sum total of the way something is designed, like the unique colors and style used in a franchised store design and product packaging.

Finally, patents are unique and “nonobvious” inventions, methods and designs. Patents do not have to be working to be patentable. They just have to be described well enough to be repeatable by a person of “ordinary skill in the art.” We’ll describe what this means below.

Patents are uniquely protected in the U.S. Constitution

Patents and copyrights are the only two property rights specifically protected by the U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8. Indeed, the Founders protected inventors because new ideas are essential to creating new wealth. They also knew that innovations are fragile flowers that would otherwise be hijacked by greed, power and wealth if not protected.

Tragically, the patent system has been hijacked by many corrupt lawyers and judges who themselves steal from real inventors and grow rich in the process.

Patents are a property deed and contract

A patent is a contract and a property deed. The contract is between We The People and the inventor. We give the inventor twenty years to exploit his or her idea for the benefit of society and to be rewarded for sharing the invention with the public.

The patent document itself describes the innovation. It’s like the “four corners” of a physical property deed (e.g., survey, terrain, frontage, roads, vegetation, water, drainage, utilities). Similarly, a patent describes an inventor’s new idea in words and diagrams.

A patent must contain enough detail to enable a third party with “ordinary skill in the art” to replicate it . . .  ostensibly for the benefit of society. The expectation is that third party will license the underlying patent in the process of adding value to it.

Richard Walker's patent could not work without Leader Technologies' social networking invention, so they stole it

Walker has not licensed the invention of social networking from Leader Technologies. Instead, as this Walker patent reveals, they just stole it.

Indeed, Walker's patent would not have worked on the large scale they describe without Leader social networking invention. We’ll show that below.

Here's the proof.

“Art” means the field of the invention, like computer hardware, software, furniture, machinery, medical device, pharmaceutical, consumer product, office product, tool, manufacturing method, agricultural implement, vehicle type, etc.

The Patent Office uses the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) for the tens of thousands of “art” classifications. An inventor must describe his/her invention in enough detail so that one of ordinary skill in the patent classification being described can replicate it.

The Walker patent discussed below identified both U.S. and International industry classifications. See also “How do I read a patent? - the Front Page.

Bookmark: #monstrous-walker-patents | https://tinyurl.com/y8jrkzlm

A monstrous family of patents

U.S. Patent Number 6,965,816 Nov. 15, 2005
“PFN/TRAC System FAA Upgrades For Accountable Remote and Robotics Control To Stop The Unauthorized Use of Aircraft and to Improve Equipment Management and Public Safety in Transportation.”
Patent enabling the Deep State to crash most any aircraft
Classification Description
U.S. (U.S. Cl.)
701/16 DATA PROCESSING: VEHICLES, NAVIGATION, AND RELATIVE LOCATION / With indication or control of landing
701/2 DATA PROCESSING: VEHICLES, NAVIGATION, AND RELATIVE LOCATION, VEHICLE CONTROL, GUIDANCE, OPERATION, OR INDICATION, Remote control system
244/189 AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS, AIRCRAFT CONTROL, Automatic, Electric course control, By remote radio signal
International  (Int. Cl.)
G06F 19/00 Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications (specially adapted for specific functions G06F 17/00; data processing systems or methods specially adapted for administrative, commercial, financial, managerial, supervisory or forecasting purposes G06Q; healthcare informatics G16H) [2018.01]
G06F 7/00 Methods or arrangements for processing data by operating upon the order or content of the data handled (logic circuits H03K 19/00) [2006.01]
Table. 1–Richard C. Walker U.S. Patent Number 6,965,816 Nov. 15, 2005 Classifications.

We recently uncovered U.S. Patent Number 6,965,816 (10.9 MB) awarded on Nov. 15, 2005 to the named sole inventor Richard C. Walker titled:

“PFN/TRAC System FAA Upgrades For Accountable Remote and Robotics Control To Stop The Unauthorized Use of Aircraft and to Improve Equipment Management and Public Safety in Transportation.”

While this patent focuses on aircraft, it is written so broadly as to encompass all kinds of equipment and devices, including people, defined as “wet-ware.”

While the patent was issued on Nov. 15, 2005, it incorporates filings going all the way back to Dec. 2, 1996.

Most patents incorporate provisional patents and related technology upon which they rely. AFI and American Intelligence Media (AIM) researchers cataloged those claims for this patent below. Several critical pieces of information emerge.

James P. Chandler, III

First, these patents to remotely control vehicles started being filed within two months of the passage of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (EEA) during Bill Clinton’s first term. The EEA was written by law professor James P. Chandler, III.

Robert Mueller, James Comey, Rod Rosenstein, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, Larry Summers were strategically positioned at the top of the Justice Department and Treasury. The patentee, Richard C. Walker, could have patented a ham sandwich had this group wanted it.

Second, the evident intent of the Walker patent was to illustrate the technology planned for control of everything—The Internet of Things.

THEIR JUSTIFICIATION: The benevolent control of vehicles and aircraft in hijack situations was merely the cover story for the development of a global surveillance grid on everyone and everything. Given the timing of these Walker filings (around 9/11), one is increasingly skeptical about who really caused 9/11.

Robert S. Mueller, III

Third, Robert S. Mueller’s law firm, Wilmer Hale LLP, formerly Hale & Dorr LLP, drove Walker's filings. Mueller was sworn in as FBI director just seven days before 9/11. This clearly implicates Wilmer Hale in the treachery.

Fourth, the global data sharing platform described in the patent was not doable by the likes of IBM, Microsoft, Boeing, AT&T and Cisco. They were all behind the curve from an R&D perspective when the Internet emerged. For example, Bill Gates thought it was a fad. The telephone pager network that Walker described could not scale to the volumes required for such global communication.

James P. Chandler surely could not believe his luck, when, in early 2000, Michael McKibben of Leader Technologies was first introduced to him. Leader was looking for the best patent attorney in the country to protect its social networking innovations.

David J. Kappos

Chandler, on the other hand, needed a fix for the Deep State's ailing digital takeover master plan. He agreed immediately to be Leader’s patent attorney. He then spent the next three years deceiving Leader until he was able to get his hands on the underlying engineering source code, which he immediately shuffled to the IBM Eclipse Foundation where DOJ’s Eric Holder and IBM’s David Kappos were waiting, along with Cisco, Microsoft, SAP, Oracle, Kleiner Perkins, Qualcomm, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, AT&T and a host of other rogue C.I.A. providers.

Leader’s source code was essential to building The Internet of Things, quickly.

The table below shows the patent filings included in the PFN/TRAC System FAA. The eventual patent focused on remote control of aircraft, but also subsumed control of vehicles, ships, equipment, commerce, education and people.

Bookmark: #walker-patent-lineage | https://tinyurl.com/ya4kfso2
U.S. Patent Number 6,965,816 Nov. 15, 2005
“PFN/TRAC System FAA Upgrades For Accountable Remote and Robotics Control To Stop The Unauthorized Use of Aircraft and to Improve Equipment Management and Public Safety in Transportation.”
Crash any aircraft, any vehicle, anytime, remotely
Incorporated claims
(i.e., ALL of these filings are included in this patent by reference)
Filing Date: Filing#/Award: Title: Attorney/Firm:
Dec. 02, 1996 60/032,217 Real-Time Vehicle Recovery System Including Stop Box That Restricts Unauthorized Use of Vehicle Irah Donner
Lowe & Price
Nov. 20, 1997 08/975,140
6,157,317
WO199824664
Secure Communication and Control System for Monitoring, Recording, Reporting and/or Restricting Unauthorized Use of Vehicle Irah H. Donner
Hale & Dorr
Jan. 19, 1999 60/139,759
WO2000078057
Secure Accountable, Modular and Programmable Software “TRAC” for PFNS Processors, Controllers, and Computer Networks to Monitor, Manage, Store and Remotely Control Data and Equipment Irah H. Donner
Pepper Hamilton
Jun. 17, 1999 60/140,029 Electrically Controlled Automated Devices to Operate, Slow, Guide, Stop and Secure Equipment and Machinery for the Purpose of Controlling Their Unsafe, Unattended, Unauthorized, Unlawful Hazardous and/or Legal Use, with Remote Control and Accountability Worldwide Irah H. Donner
Pepper Hamilton
Jan. 19, 2000 60/176,818 Protected Accountable Interfaces Termed PFNS with Secure Modular and Programmable Software Termed TRAC to Monitor, Manage, Store and Remotely Control and Data and Equipment for Everyday Use to Extremely Aggressive High Security Applications Irah H. Donner
Pepper Hamilton
May 01, 2000 60/200,872 Personal PFN systems for accountable tracking remote management and aggressive control scenarios Henry N. Wixon
Wilmer Hale LLP
Oct. 19, 2000 60/330,088 Durable high barrier metallized polypropylene film [for embedded body electronics] Raj S. Dave
Morrison & Foerster
Sep. 04, 2001   Robert S. Mueller, III appointed by George Bush as FBI Director Former
Hale & Dorr, Wilmer Hale
Oct. 01, 2001 60/325,538
WO2003029922
PFN/TAC system FAA upgrades for accountable remote and robotics control to stop the unauthorized use of aircraft and to improve equipment management and public safety in transportation Irah H. Donner
Hale & Dorr
Oct. 19, 2001 60/330,085
WO2003029922
PFN/TAC system FAA upgrades for accountable remote and robotics control to stop the unauthorized use of aircraft and to improve equipment management and public safety in transportation Irah H. Donner
Hale & Dorr LLP
Oct. 01, 2002 Issued:
Nov. 15, 2005
10/260,525
6,965,816
PFN/TRAC System FAA Upgrades For Accountable Remote and Robotics Control To Stop The Unauthorized Use of Aircraft and to Improve Equipment Management and Public Safety in Transportation Irah H. Donner
Wilmer Hale
May 28, 2003 10/401,041 Automated Accounting System that Values, Controls, Records and Bills the Uses of Equipment/Vehicles for Society Irah H. Donner
Wilmer Hale
Oct. 28, 2003
Oct. 28, 2004
60/514,833
10/975,109
National / international management and security system for responsible global resourcing through technical management to bridge cultural and economic disparity  Richard C. Walker, pro se
Table 2—Richard C. Walker. Patent filings incorporated into U.S. Patent No. 6,965,816.

Bookmark: #who-is-richard-c-walker | https://tinyurl.com/y9wxbvrp

Who is Richard C. Walker?
a.k.a. "Rick Walker"

Richard C. Walker
Fig. 4–Richard C. Walker, Hewlett-Packard, Kline & Walker, LLC, Agilent Technologies, client of Wilmer Hall LLP (formerly Hale & Dorr LLP).

Did he really invent all these patents?

Walker is a geek scientist who has worked inside the bowels of Hewlett-Packard and Agilent Technologies his entire career.

We do not believe that Walker is the sole inventor. The sheer breadth of global policy perspectives incorporated in these documents shows a collective policy mind.

Our hunch is that they are derived from the illegal Highlands Group that has been secretly convened since late 1994 by the Department of Defense to begin coordinating the Deep State takeover of the Internet.

According to Walker’s resume, he was a Principal Staff Scientist at Hewlett-Packard (HP) for twenty-one (21) years from Jan. 1981 to 2002. Since 2002 he has been a Senior R&D Electrical Engineer at Agilent Technologies, for whom he continues to file patents.

Richard C. Walker Online biographies
Years City Organization Activity
1978-1981   Caltech BS, Engineering and Applied Science
1988-1992   California State University-Chico MS, Compter Science
1981-1991   Hewlett-Packard Laboratories Technical Staff
1981-2000 Palo Alto HP Labs Principal Project Engineer
1981-2001 Palo Alto Hewlett-Packard Principal Project Engineer
1991-2003 Palo Alto Agilent Technologies Principal Project Engineer
1982-2004 Palo Alto Agilent Technologies Principal Project Engineer
2005-2012 Palo Alto Adema Technologies Consultant
2009-2015 Palo Alto Corning Consulting Electrical Engineer
2015-2016 Palo Alto Speck Design Consulting Electrical Engineer
2010-current Palo Alto R&R Engineering LLC Owner
2016-current Santa Clara Agilent Technologies Sr. R&D Electrical Engineer
Table 3–Richard C. Walker biographies. Sources: LinkedIn, ResearchGate.

Walker has consistently failed to disclose his Kline & Walker, LLC company that claims ownership of this 170-page total global surveillance "Internet of Things" patent . . . even though he assigned the patent to Kline & Walker, LLC (a defunct company) on Nov. 15, 2005

1998 to (at least Nov. 15 2005) Potomac MD Kline & Walker, LLC Owner & Inventor

Patent Office records show that at least until Nov. 15, 2005 when the patent was awarded, “Kline & Walker LLC” was still the owner or “Assignee.” This information alone shows "fraud on the court" or "inequitable conduct" since the official company records in both Maryland and Delaware show that Kline & Walker, LLC was long defunct for nonpayment of taxes, see below.

Remarkably, he does not show his employers, HP or Agilent Technologies, as the assignee, which is what one would normally expect to see from such a large volume of work. Corporations rarely—almost never—allow an employee to file for patents that are not assigned to the company.

State corporate records show that Kline & Walker LLC was formed in Delaware on Aug. 06, 1998, then 20 days later in Maryland on Aug. 26, 1998. These records also show that these companies did not pay any taxes and were both closed after the statutory waiting period.

Therefore, Kline & Walker LLC appears to be a faked company running interference for the true inventors (we think the Highlands Group). Such conduct, if true, is called “inequitable conduct” in patent law. Patents are not permitted to disguise material contributors.

Bookmark: #hp-agilent-complicity | https://tinyurl.com/y9qpnuj3

Agilent Technologies is evidently a Deep State surveillance supplier

Walker’s current employer, Agilient Technologies, was a spin off of HP that went public on Nov. 18, 1999. That was only a week after Bill Clinton and his Treasury Secretary Larry Summers abolished Glass-Steagall. Summer’s chief of staff then was Sheryl K. Sandberg, the subsequent creator of Gmail (2004) and the current chief operating officer of Facebook (2008 to current). Another Summers employee then was Marne L. Levine. Levine who married disgraced C.I.A. director John M. Deutch’s son, and is now chief operating officer at Instagram. Deutch was pardoned by Bill Clinton on the same day as Marc Rich. It's truly a cozy little world at the top of the criminal Internet of Things.

Agilent raised $2.1 billion and was the largest Silicon Valley public offering ever at that time. The usual globalist shadow government suspects were the Agilent underwriters: Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Credit Suisse, JPMorgan, etc. The insider trading is evident.

To put the Agilent Technologies / HP actions in context, on Jul. 14, 1999, President Bill Clinton formed the National Intellectual Property Assurance Council (NIAC) by Executive Order #13130 with James P. Chandler, III.

A few months later on Sep. 29, 1999, President Bill Clinton formed In-Q-Tel to run a rogue C.I.A. private venture capital company in Silicon Valley.

A few weeks later on Nov. 12, 1999, Bill Clinton and Larry Summers, Clinton’s Treasury Secretary and Chandler’s Harvard colleague, abolished Glass–Steagall market protections separating underwriting and banking.

Evidently, Agilent Technologies and HP are key suppliers to the Internet of Things.

HP & Agilent are Complicit

Here is a complete U.S. Patent Office list of the patents attributed to Richard C. Walker as the inventor. Eleven (11) are assigned to Hewlett-Packard and fourteen (14) are assigned to Agilent Technologies, Inc.

These patents are very evidently refinements of Walker's "control everything" patent. They are full of euphamisms (deceptions) to obscure the true censorship purpose.

Here's just one example:

Bookmark: #walker-predator-eyeglasses | https://tinyurl.com/ycnvvznt

Walker Patented Predator Spy Glasses for secret ID & data collection

U.S. Pat. No. 6,735,328 filed on filed on Mar. 07, 2000 (soon after Agilent was founded), awarded May 11, 2004 and assigned to Agilent Techologies, Inc. is titled "Personal viewing device with system for providing identification information to a connected system."

Walker helped patent a system for spies to identify anyone or any thing (Internet of Things) by wearing his glasses as the viewing device (Read: You can run, but you cannot hide from Walker and his predator friends). A sister patent is a special helmet that enables the system to determine exact location (latitude, longitude and altitude) of the target being viewed through these glasses.

U.S. Pat. No. 6,735,328, Fig. 2. Mar. 07, 2000, awarded May 11, 2004 and assigned to Agilent Techologies, Inc. is titled 'Personal viewing device with system for providing identification information to a connected system.'
Fig. 5–U.S. Pat. No. 6,735,328, Fig. 2. Mar. 07, 2000, awarded May 11, 2004 and assigned to Agilent Techologies, Inc. is titled "Personal viewing device with system for providing identification information to a connected system."

Bookmark: #walker-can-crash-planes-remotely | https://tinyurl.com/y8lexc97

This system can crash planes & vehicles remotely

Click image to enlargeU.S. Patent No. 6,965,816, Fig. 1.

Bookmark: #world-economy | https://tinyurl.com/y84bpstu

This system was planned to control the global economy, Soviet Style

"Socio-Economic and Environmental Technology Accounting System for Democratic Government"

This appears like a Soviet-style central government system.

Click image to enlargeU.S. Patent No. 6,965,816, re. Fig. 40 ("World Organization"). Incorporated by reference in multiple Walker applications, including U.S. Pat. App. No. 10/401,041, Fig. 2B, Automated Accounting System That Values Controls Records and Bills The Uses of Equipment Vehicles For Society.
Fig. 7–U.S. Patent No. 6,965,816, re. Fig. 40 ("World Organization"). Incorporated by reference in multiple Walker applications, including U.S. Pat. App. No. 10/401,041, Fig. 2B, Automated Accounting System That Values Controls Records and Bills The Uses of Equipment Vehicles For Society.

Bookmark: #internet-of-things | https://tinyurl.com/ybxfwav4

Memo to Wet-ware: The Internet of Things plans to control everything  in your life and your family's life

Click image to enlargeThe Internet of Things. Beecham Research.
Fig. 8–Boston and London Internet of Things pitchman Beecham Research has produced this cute little pastel illustration of the demonic takeover.

Bookmark: #trump-fund-leader-miller-act-notice | https://tinyurl.com/yd59t8x7

Can this technocratic takeover be stopped? Yes, but we must start removing the spying tools immediately

Defund these criminals—their corruptly-acquired power must be removed.

Stop the criminals who are responsible for this, which means we need to lock up Hillary and the others truly responsible.

Ask President Trump to pay Leader Technologies' Miller Act Notice. This generates hundreds of billions of dollars in new revenue for the federal government without raising taxes, among the many benefits. It will also help to start developing a true Free Press envisioned by the Founders and now lost to the globalists.

See also previous post: AFI. (Nov. 22, 2017). The Weaponization of Social Media Should Concern Us All [VIDEO]. Americans for Innovation.

* * *

Notices: This post may contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Photos used are for educational purposes only and were obtained from public sources. No claims whatsoever are made to any photo.

Comment

Click "N comments:" on the line just below this instruction to comment on this post. Alternatively, send an email with your comment to amer4innov@gmail.com and we'll post it for you. We welcome and encourage anonymous comments, especially from whisteblowers.